| Changing Rules and
Compliance Tools by
Kim North, Co-founder, Technology & Technical
 |
| Kim North,
Co-founder, Technology & Technical |
Now we have the final consultation on
the menu, bringing us tantalisingly closer to the final raft of the
depolarisation rules, a cloud of relief floats around IFA offices.
But why? From an adviser’s point of view, apart from deciding
whether to become a single tie, multi tie or remain independent,
very few changes are needed to internal processes.
The only other major decision to be
taken is whether an advisory firm wishes to take responsibility for
their own compliance or pass the responsibility elsewhere - for
example to a principal under the mortgage adviser regulations, which
will apply from 31st October this year. Whichever route is taken, as
long as appropriate technology tools are in place to keep the
regulators calm and clients impressed, it appears that firms can
continue to build an advisory business of substance as the net wealth
of the population increases.
Compliance Costs
The majority of the cost to implement
some of the new rules appears to be in the reproduction of the
required compliance documentation. Having personally written more than
750 Key Features documents over the years, for many providers, I am
keen to ensure that clients are given documentation they want to read
so there are no surprises. The move from Key Features to Key Facts may
help with clarity if a client does bother to read the document, but at
what cost? The point of sale documentation produced by providers will
have to go back to the drawing board again for a wholesale rewrite,
re-print and re-distribution, albeit some of this electronically,
saving some of their precious budgets.
The proposed initial ‘Key Facts about
our services’, or Initial Disclosure Document – which is the first
document a client sees, seems to work well thanks to the invaluable
input of AIFA and IFA Promotion. This document mentions the regulator,
the ombudsman and the compensation scheme by name, but also
substantially more than the name of the company providing ‘the
service’. However the client may be comforted that the FSA is far more
prominent in the point of sale literature than ever before, which
could encourage clients to seek guidance from the regulator should
they need further information or have a problem. Although in contrast,
there could be the perception that the FSA has endorsed the product,
which may not be quite as sensible.
Each firm will also need a corporate
brochure or ‘guide to our services’, a professional web site,
structured e-mail contact and a quality help line if the client is to
always contact their firm first for any financial matter. According to
IFA Promotion, who has over 10,700 IFA firms as members, there is some
way to go for IFAs to reproduce this ecommerce utopia, as only half of
their membership claim to have a website.
Until UK financial services moves
closer to the US model, where financial products are vetted by the
regulator before being marketed, we will operate in an arena with far
too many products (over 30,000) and many unsuitable products
manufactured by providers - such as those highlighted by the precipice
bond debacle. Even though a raft of further regulatory change follows,
from the ‘Insurance Mediation Directive’ to ‘Sandler’ to ‘pension
simplification’, amongst this noise and activity very little is being
discussed regarding the responsibility of providers to ensure products
are ‘fit for purpose’.
The depolarisation draft rules have
indeed laid a ‘golden egg’ at the feet of IFAs to really lift
themselves above the confusing and overcrowded array of distributors
and rightfully claim their territory as the only place to get truly
independent financial advice. The costs may be painful short-term but
the eventual winners longer-term could well be those who do their
preparation ahead of the rest and the role of technology in reaching
this position should not be under-estimated.
About Kim
Professional Adviser recently placed
Kim North in their top 50 most influential people working in the
Independent Financial Advice sector. Kim’s background includes 8
years with Royal Insurance and a further 8 years at the Pretty
Technical Partnership (PTP), which she co-founded with Jo Smith. PTP
provided consultancy to over 50 financial services companies over
this period. Kim’s activities continue to be varied – recently
delivering the e-commerce strategy and implementation for a National
employee benefits company and in the past regularly represented AXA
on the ABI initiative SALTR – Raising Standards, on the
Communications Group. Kim has recently founded ‘Technology and
Technical’ in partnership with Nicola Mitchell – which aims to help
the financial services industry develop and promote relevant
technology which supports the ever changing regulatory environment.
|
 |